Academy Preseason Planning | What U14-U19 Preparation Should Actually Include
- FPA Team

- Jul 22
- 3 min read
A proper preseason for Κ14-Κ19 football players should not look like punishment with cones. It should build the body, sharpen the football brain, restore match rhythm, and reduce avoidable injury risk. The problem is not hard work. The problem is hard work without sequence, recovery, or age logic.
Why Academy Preseason Planning Matters
Good Academy Preseason Planning starts with one question: what does this age group need to tolerate once matches begin?
For Κ14 and Κ15, the answer is often coordination, movement quality, gradual running exposure, and protection during growth spurts. For Κ18 and Κ19, the answer shifts towards senior-style demands: repeated sprints, faster decisions, stronger duels, and recovery between high-intensity days.
It looks harmless when every age group does the same drills. It is not. A 14-year-old in a growth spurt and a 19-year-old near senior football are not the same athlete.
What Ideal Preseason Should Include
Under ideal conditions, preseason includes:
Medical and movement screening before full intensity.
Growth and maturity checks, especially height changes and soreness history.
Progressive running exposure, including accelerations, decelerations, and high-speed running.
Strength and neuromuscular training, not random gym fatigue.
Technical work under fatigue, because football skill must survive pressure.
Tactical clarity, so players understand roles before matches begin.
Recovery monitoring, including sleep, soreness, mood, and perceived effort.
Friendly matches with a purpose, not just minutes to “see who is ready”.
The strongest programmes do not chase exhaustion. They build availability.
The Hidden Risk Is the Jump
Most preseason problems are not caused by one difficult session. They are caused by a sudden jump.
A football player who rested for three weeks, then starts gym work, personal training, team preseason, friendly matches, and extra running in the same fortnight is not “committed”. He is exposed. The body needs progression before it can tolerate chaos.
Parents should watch for:
repeated heel, knee, groin, or hamstring soreness,
heavy legs that last more than two days,
sleep changes,
loss of appetite,
irritability before training,
pain that changes running style.
These are not signs of weakness. They are information.

What Parents Should Ask Without Interfering
Parents do not need to coach from the side. But they should understand whether the programme has a brain.
Useful questions sound like this:
“How are running loads increased after the summer break?”
“Do you adjust for players in growth spurts?”
“How are friendly-match minutes planned?”
“Is gym work linked to football demands?”
“What soreness should we report early?”
That is not pressure. That is responsible parenting.
Parent Advice
Check growth-spurt status because preseason load tolerance changes around peak height velocity.
Ask whether high-speed running is progressed before friendly matches increase match exposure.
Watch soreness patterns because repeated tendon pain signals poor recovery-load balance during preseason.
Key Takeaways
Ideal preseason builds match demands gradually, not fitness theatre for tired teenagers.
Growth timing changes load tolerance, especially around peak height velocity windows.
Recovery monitoring is preparation, because fatigue hides before injuries become obvious visible.
References
Lechner, S., Ammar, A., Boukhris, O., Trabelsi, K., Glenn, J. M., Schwarz, J., Hammouda, O., Zmijewski, P., Chtourou, H., Driss, T., & Hoekelmann, A. (2023). Monitoring training load in youth soccer players: Effects of a six-week preparatory training program and the associations between external and internal loads. Biology of Sport, 40(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.112094
Owoeye, O. B. A., VanderWey, M. J., & Pike, I. (2020). Reducing injuries in soccer (football): An umbrella review of best evidence across the epidemiological framework for prevention. Sports Medicine - Open, 6, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00274-7
Pakarinen, O., Ponkilainen, V. T., & Kuitunen, I. (2025). Association of peak height velocity and skeletal maturity to injury incidence in male elite adolescent football (soccer) players: A systematic review. Health Science Reports, 8(7), e71096. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71096
Towlson, C., Salter, J., Ade, J. D., Enright, K., Harper, L. D., Page, R. M., & Malone, J. J. (2021). Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance in youth soccer: One size does not fit all. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 10(4), 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.003
Verstappen, S., van Rijn, R. M., Cost, R., Stubbe, J. H., & others. (2021). The association between training load and injury risk in elite youth soccer players: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Sports Medicine - Open, 7, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00296-1
Wik, E. H. (2022). Growth, maturation and injuries in high-level youth football (soccer): A mini review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 975900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.975900



