Relative Age Effect | Does Birth Quarter Shape Who Turns Professional?
A child’s birth month can affect opportunities in youth football, but it does not determine how far that player will go. Across leading European professional leagues, players born from January to March are currently the largest birth-quarter group overall. The picture is different when we ask who actually progresses from an academy into professional football. Birth quarter influences selection, but it is not a reliable prediction of professional success.
The Relative Age Effect and the Four Birth Quarters
For clarity, every birth quarter in this article follows the normal calendar year from January to December.
The Relative Age Effect is a selection bias in which children who are relatively older within an age-group system can become overrepresented compared with relatively younger children.
The quarters used throughout this article are:
Q1: January to March
Q2: April to June
Q3: July to September
Q4: October to December
One important UK detail remains. English youth football normally uses a September-to-August age-group year, so a September-born player is relatively old within that English cohort, while an August-born player is relatively young.
Calendar quarters therefore make birth dates easier to understand, but they do not replace the actual age-group cut-off used by a particular football system.
Why Birth Month Can Matter in Academy Football
Birth month can influence academy selection because several months of extra development may affect how a young player looks at the moment they are assessed.
In a large sample of UK professional academy players aged U9 to U16, players born from September to November were heavily overrepresented, while those born from June to August were underrepresented.
The difference was substantial. Around 45% of the academy sample came from September to November, compared with about 10% from June to August.
Several mechanisms may contribute:
differences in physical size and strength
additional months of practice and experience
differences in confidence and opportunity
interactions between chronological age and biological maturation
Evidence for academy selection bias is strong. Evidence that an early birth date causes superior long-term football ability is not.
Which Birth Quarter Is Most Common in Top-Flight Football?
Across Europe’s top ten professional leagues, Q1 players born from January to March are currently the most represented birth-quarter group overall.
Data from 5,238 professional players in the 2023-24 season showed:
Q1, January to March: 30.3%
Q2, April to June: 27.2%
Q3, July to September: 21.9%
Q4, October to December: 20.5%
The overall association was statistically significant but small.
The pattern also differed substantially between leagues. Importantly for UK parents, the Premier League showed no statistically significant difference between the four calendar birth quarters.
So the simplest answer is: January to March is the most common birth quarter across Europe’s leading leagues overall, but not necessarily within the Premier League.
Being Common Is Not the Same as Being More Likely to Make It
A larger number of Q1 professionals does not prove that an individual Q1 academy player has the greatest chance of becoming professional.
Representation tells us who is currently there. Conversion tells us what proportion of selected young players eventually reach professional football.
Those are different questions.
A longitudinal Belgian elite-youth cohort produced an interesting opposite pattern. Among players who had already survived elite youth selection, 76.2% of the relatively youngest group eventually obtained professional contracts, compared with 46.6% of the relatively oldest group.
First-division progression was also higher in the younger group in that cohort.
The evidence is intriguing but limited. The youngest group contained only 21 players, and one national development system cannot establish a universal rule.
Relative Age Effect Changes as Players Get Older
The Relative Age Effect is generally stronger in youth selection than in senior professional football, suggesting that early selection advantages do not remain equally powerful forever.
Recent European national-team evidence shows a strong early-birth bias at U17 level, followed by a weaker pattern among senior internationals.
Senior squads contained proportionally more later-born players than would have been expected from the youth-player distribution.
English evidence follows a similar direction. Strong relative-age patterns remain visible in U18 and U21 football, while top-level senior English squads show much less evidence of the same imbalance.
Professional development therefore filters players differently from academy recruitment.
What Birth Quarter Can and Cannot Tell a Parent
Birth quarter can help explain part of a young player’s selection environment, but it cannot tell parents whether that child will reach first-team football.
A relatively older child may receive an early advantage in visibility or selection. A relatively younger child may face a harder route through the same system.
Neither pathway guarantees the final outcome.
For parents, the useful question is not, “Was my child born in the right quarter?”
A better question is whether coaches are judging long-term football development rather than simply rewarding whoever looks strongest, quickest or most physically ready today.
Birth date can shape the pathway. It does not write the ending.
Parent Questions
Which birth quarter produces the most professional footballers?
January to March is currently the most represented calendar birth quarter across Europe’s top ten professional leagues, accounting for about 30% of players in recent data. That does not mean a Q1 child has a 30% chance of becoming professional. Representation reflects many years of selection and development, and the Premier League itself does not show the same significant quarter difference.
Is my child disadvantaged if they are born late in the English football year?
A June, July or August birth can place a child among the relatively youngest players in an English September-to-August age group. That may affect early selection, particularly where physical development influences assessment. It does not indicate lower long-term potential, and relative-age differences become less clear as players progress towards senior professional football.
Does being born from January to March give a child a better chance of reaching the first division?
A January-to-March birth cannot be treated as a reliable predictor of reaching first-division football. Q1 players are currently more common across several top European leagues, but individual progression evidence is far more complex. Some longitudinal evidence has even shown better professional conversion among relatively younger elite youth players who had already survived the selection system.
References
Bolckmans, S., Starkes, J. L., Towlson, C., Barnes, C., Parkin, G., & Helsen, W. F. (2022). Leveling the playing field: A new proposed method to address relative age- and maturity-related bias in UK male academy soccer players. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 847438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.847438
Bolckmans, S., Perquy, K., Starkes, J. L., Memmert, D., & Helsen, W. F. (2023). The relationships between relative age effect, personality constructs and achievement level in soccer. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1226599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1226599
Bozděch, M., Agricola, A., & Zháněl, J. (2023). The relative age effect at different age periods in soccer: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 130(6), 2632-2662. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125231210585
Brustio, P. R., McAuley, A. B. T., Ungureanu, A. N., & Kelly, A. L. (2024). Career trajectories, transition rates, and birthdate distributions: The rocky road from youth to senior level in men’s European football. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1420220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1420220
Doncaster, G., Kelly, A. L., McAuley, A. B. T., Cain, A., Partington, M., Nelson, L., & O’Gorman, J. (2026). Relative age effects and the Premier League’s Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP): A comparison of birthdate distributions within and between age groups. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 8, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-024-00285-w
Işık, M., Yavuz, M., Dişçeken, O., Ceylan, H. İ., Öksüz, T., & Demir, K. (2025). Positional relative age effect in Europe’s top ten football leagues. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17, 258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01312-1
Morganti, G., Kelly, A. L., Lascu, A., Brustio, P. R., Padua, E., Filetti, C., Porta, M., Briotti, G., & Ruscello, B. (2025). Relative age effects in European soccer: Their association with contextual factors, impact on youth national teams’ performance, and presence at the senior level. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1546978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1546978
